On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 05:53:01PM -0700, Ruslan Babayev wrote: > This allows drivers to lookup i2c adapters on ACPI based systems similar to > of_get_i2c_adapter_by_node() with DT based systems. > > Signed-off-by: Ruslan Babayev <rus...@babayev.com> > Cc: xe-linux-exter...@cisco.com
Please have a look how your patches look in my inbox: May 05 Ruslan Babayev ( 129) [PATCH] net: phy: sfp: enable i2c-bus detection on ACPI based systems May 05 Ruslan Babayev ( 65) ├─>[PATCH 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle May 24 Ruslan Babayev ( 65) └─>[PATCH net-next v2 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle May 05 Ruslan Babayev ( 65) [PATCH net-next 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle May 06 Ruslan Babayev ( 3) ├─>[PATCH RFC v2 net-next] Enable SFP support on ACPI May 06 Ruslan Babayev ( 65) ├─>[PATCH RFC v2 net-next 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle May 06 Ruslan Babayev ( 120) └─>[PATCH RFC v2 net-next 2/2] net: phy: sfp: enable i2c-bus detection on ACPI based systems May 07 Ruslan Babayev ( 154) └─&─> May 07 Ruslan Babayev ( 10) └─> May 22 Ruslan Babayev ( 29) └─> May 05 Ruslan Babayev ( 93) [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: sfp: enable i2c-bus detection on ACPI based systems May 06 Ruslan Babayev ( 25) ├─&─> May 06 Ruslan Babayev ( 99) └─&─> This is highly confusing, and super hard to find out which patches belong together. v2 2/2 seems even missing. Please resend this as a new series without any in-reply-to, and a fresh cover-letter, so I know which one to apply to my tree. Thanks, Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
