On Aug 23 2007 19:13, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
>And you can do even better with this:
>
>void *memchr(const void *s, int c, size_t n)
>{
>       const unsigned char *p = s, *e = s + n;
>       const unsigned char *e = p + n;

Uhm, you have two "e"s in there.

>       for (; p < e ; p++)
>                if ((unsigned char)c == *p)
>                        return (void *)p;
>
>       return NULL;
>}

Or do it glibc-style

void *memchr(const void *s, unsigned char c, size_t n)
{
        ...
        for (; p + 3 < e; p += 4) {
                if (c == p[0])
                        return (void *)&p[0];
                if (c == p[1])
                        return (void *)&p[1];
                if (c == p[2])
                        return (void *)&p[2];
                if (c == p[3])
                        return (void *)&p[3];
        }
        ... /* check the rest */
}


        Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to