On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:41:23AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > > On Mon, 20 May 2019 12:52:52 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote: > > --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl > > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl > > @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ > > 425 common io_uring_setup __x64_sys_io_uring_setup > > 426 common io_uring_enter __x64_sys_io_uring_enter > > 427 common io_uring_register __x64_sys_io_uring_register > > +428 common process_madvise __x64_sys_process_madvise > > > Much better if something similar is added for arm64.
I will port every architecture once we figure out RFC and reaches the conclusion for right interface. > > > # > > # x32-specific system call numbers start at 512 to avoid cache impact > > --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h > > @@ -832,6 +832,8 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_io_uring_setup, sys_io_uring_setup) > > __SYSCALL(__NR_io_uring_enter, sys_io_uring_enter) > > #define __NR_io_uring_register 427 > > __SYSCALL(__NR_io_uring_register, sys_io_uring_register) > > +#define __NR_process_madvise 428 > > +__SYSCALL(__NR_process_madvise, sys_process_madvise) > > > > #undef __NR_syscalls > > #define __NR_syscalls 428 > > Seems __NR_syscalls needs to increment by one. Thanks. I will fix it.
