[ Upstream commit a65c88e16f32aa9ef2e8caa68ea5c29bd5eb0ff0 ]

In-NMI warnings have been added to vmalloc_fault() via:

  ebc8827f75 ("x86: Barf when vmalloc and kmemcheck faults happen in NMI")

back in the time when our NMI entry code could not cope with nested NMIs.

These days, it's perfectly fine to take a fault in NMI context and we
don't have to care about the fact that IRET from the fault handler might
cause NMI nesting.

This warning has already been removed from 32-bit implementation of
vmalloc_fault() in:

  6863ea0cda8 ("x86/mm: Remove in_nmi() warning from vmalloc_fault()")

but the 64-bit version was omitted.

Remove the bogus warning also from 64-bit implementation of vmalloc_fault().

Reported-by: Nicolai Stange <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Fixes: 6863ea0cda8 ("x86/mm: Remove in_nmi() warning from vmalloc_fault()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 667f1da36208e..5eaf67e8314f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -359,8 +359,6 @@ static noinline int vmalloc_fault(unsigned long address)
        if (!(address >= VMALLOC_START && address < VMALLOC_END))
                return -1;
 
-       WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
-
        /*
         * Copy kernel mappings over when needed. This can also
         * happen within a race in page table update. In the later
-- 
2.20.1



Reply via email to