thanks, i think your suggestion is ok.
in my previous method is easy to understand for spectre logic,
but your suggestion is more sense to use of array_index_nospec.
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:48 AM Matthew Wilcox <wi...@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 08:37:28PM +0800, Dianzhang Chen wrote:
> > The `size` in kmalloc_slab() is indirectly controlled by userspace via
> > syscall: poll(defined in fs/select.c), hence leading to a potential
> > exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability.
> > The `size` can be controlled from: poll -> do_sys_poll -> kmalloc ->
> > __kmalloc -> kmalloc_slab.
> >
> > Fix this by sanitizing `size` before using it to index size_index.
>
> I think it makes more sense to sanitize size in size_index_elem(),
> don't you?
>
> static inline unsigned int size_index_elem(unsigned int bytes)
> {
> - return (bytes - 1) / 8;
> + return array_index_nospec((bytes - 1) / 8, ARRAY_SIZE(size_index));
> }
>
> (untested)
