Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> [...]
> +              * [...] We don't need to grab
> +              * any locks, we just keep trying until get all the
> +              * calculations together in one state.
> +              *
> +              * In fact, we __cant__ grab any locks. This
> +              * function is called from the latency_tracer which can
> +              * be called anywhere. To grab any locks (including
> +              * seq_locks) we risk putting ourselves into a deadlock.

Perhaps you could add a comment about why the loop, which appears
potentially infinite as written, avoids livelock.  (It looks rather
like a seqlock read loop.)

- FChE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to