On 5/31/19 11:18 AM, Fabien Dessenne wrote:
> Manage the irq = 0 case, where we shall return an error.
> 
> Fixes: b5b5a27bee58 ("media: stm32-dcmi: return appropriate error codes 
> during probe")
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c 
> b/drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c
> index b9dad0a..d855e9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c
> @@ -1702,7 +1702,7 @@ static int dcmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       if (irq <= 0) {

Shouldn't this be 'irq < 0' instead of '<=' ?

AFAICT irq == 0 can be a valid irq and isn't an error.

Regards,

        Hans

>               if (irq != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not get irq\n");
> -             return irq;
> +             return irq ? irq : -ENXIO;
>       }
>  
>       dcmi->res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> 

Reply via email to