Hi!
> > Does this make sense?
>
> Yes, this is a sensible optimization. But I think it may be better to
> make bootloader load kernel D directly into a specified memory location.
> For example, we can add a option to "kernel" command of grub.
>
> And, I think we can do more in bootloader. Such as we can prepare
> two
Yes, that would be nice.
It will mean quite a bit of work, but I guess it should be the long
term goal. Loading restore kernel directly from bootloader means:
1) it is fast -- no need to boot another kernel
2) it is "classical" way of doing things
On the other hand, we loose flexibility that way:
1) it locks you onto one bootloader
2) you no longer have userland there to do uncompression, decryption,
etc..
Pave
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
