On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 02:45 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Daniel Walker pisze: > > [snip] > > > Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla? > > > > Yes, I have considered it. > > > > Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is > > a regression field, but there are no difference between > > 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression. > > > > Most people are reporting bugs through LKML: > > - 23 regressions with reference to LKML > > - 4 regressions with reference to Bugzilla > > The main reason that I commented on this was because of your comment > below in the release emails, > > Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. > http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions > > And I was thinking, if these bugz need to transition over the bugzilla > anyway why not go straight there instead of via kernelnewbies .. People > would just get bugzilla accounts and open new bugz entry.
Some people hates Bugzilla, and they do not want to use it. > > I not trying to force you into something , and ultimately it whatever is > easier for you.. Which was my main reason for commenting on it. > > > > If you had a > > > search of open bugs they would just fall of the list as they get > > > closed.. > > > > Unfortunately, the world is not perfect. > > I think over time it would work like that , but I'm sure there's lots of > people who don't care about our bugzilla .. > > Daniel > > Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/