Le 07/06/2019 à 12:34, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
Very similar definitions for notify_page_fault() are being used by multiple
architectures duplicating much of the same code. This attempts to unify all
of them into a generic implementation, rename it as kprobe_page_fault() and
then move it to a common header.

kprobes_built_in() can detect CONFIG_KPROBES, hence new kprobe_page_fault()
need not be wrapped again within CONFIG_KPROBES. Trap number argument can
now contain upto an 'unsigned int' accommodating all possible platforms.

kprobe_page_fault() goes the x86 way while dealing with preemption context.
As explained in these following commits the invoking context in itself must
be non-preemptible for kprobes processing context irrespective of whether
kprobe_running() or perhaps smp_processor_id() is safe or not. It does not
make much sense to continue when original context is preemptible. Instead
just bail out earlier.

commit a980c0ef9f6d
("x86/kprobes: Refactor kprobes_fault() like kprobe_exceptions_notify()")

commit b506a9d08bae ("x86: code clarification patch to Kprobes arch code")

Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]>
---
Testing:

- Build and boot tested on arm64 and x86
- Build tested on some other archs (arm, sparc64, alpha, powerpc etc)

Changes in RFC V3:

- Updated the commit message with an explaination for new preemption behaviour
- Moved notify_page_fault() to kprobes.h with 'static nokprobe_inline' per 
Matthew
- Changed notify_page_fault() return type from int to bool per Michael Ellerman
- Renamed notify_page_fault() as kprobe_page_fault() per Peterz

Changes in RFC V2: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10974221/)

- Changed generic notify_page_fault() per Mathew Wilcox
- Changed x86 to use new generic notify_page_fault()
- s/must not/need not/ in commit message per Matthew Wilcox

Changes in RFC V1: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10968273/)

  arch/arm/mm/fault.c      | 24 +-----------------------
  arch/arm64/mm/fault.c    | 24 +-----------------------
  arch/ia64/mm/fault.c     | 24 +-----------------------
  arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c  | 23 ++---------------------
  arch/s390/mm/fault.c     | 16 +---------------
  arch/sh/mm/fault.c       | 18 ++----------------
  arch/sparc/mm/fault_64.c | 16 +---------------
  arch/x86/mm/fault.c      | 21 ++-------------------
  include/linux/kprobes.h  | 16 ++++++++++++++++
  9 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)


[...]

diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
index 443d980..064dd15 100644
--- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
@@ -458,4 +458,20 @@ static inline bool is_kprobe_optinsn_slot(unsigned long 
addr)
  }
  #endif
+static nokprobe_inline bool kprobe_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
+                                             unsigned int trap)
+{
+       int ret = 0;

ret is pointless.

+
+       /*
+        * To be potentially processing a kprobe fault and to be allowed
+        * to call kprobe_running(), we have to be non-preemptible.
+        */
+       if (kprobes_built_in() && !preemptible() && !user_mode(regs)) {
+               if (kprobe_running() && kprobe_fault_handler(regs, trap))

don't need an 'if A if B', can do 'if A && B'

+                       ret = 1;

can do 'return true;' directly here

+       }
+       return ret;

And 'return false' here.

Christophe

+}
+
  #endif /* _LINUX_KPROBES_H */

Reply via email to