Konstantin,
> + if (dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_NOTRIM) > + trim_status = "backlisted"; blacklisted > + else > + trim_status = "supported"; > + > + if (!ata_fpdma_dsm_supported(dev)) > + trim_queued = "no"; > + else if (dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM) > + trim_queued = "backlisted"; ditto > + else > + trim_queued = "yes"; Why is trim_status "supported" and trim_queued/trim_zero "yes"? > + > + if (!ata_id_has_zero_after_trim(id)) > + trim_zero = "no"; > + else if (dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_ZERO_AFTER_TRIM) > + trim_zero = "yes"; > + else > + trim_zero = "maybe"; > + > + ata_dev_info(dev, "trim: %s, queued: %s, > zero_after_trim: %s\n", > + trim_status, trim_queued, trim_zero); > + } > + Otherwise no particular objections. We were trying to limit noise during boot which is why this information originally went to sysfs instead of being printed during probe. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
