On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:36:24AM +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> > > It appears that there is a missing break statement for the AF_INET6 case > that falls through to the default WARN_ONCE case. I don't think that is > intentional. Fix this by adding in the missing break. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Missing break in switch") > Fixes: 4c203b0454b5 ("xfrm: remove eth_proto value from xfrm_state_afinfo") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
I have already a patch from Florian in queue to fix this. Thanks anyway!
