Hi Lubomir,

On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 04:00:23PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> The commit d790b7eda953 ("[media] vb2-dma-sg: move dma_(un)map_sg here")
> left dma_desc_nent unset. It previously contained the number of DMA
> descriptors as returned from dma_map_sg().
>
> We can now (since the commit referred to above) obtain the same value from
> the sg_table and drop dma_desc_nent altogether.
>
> Tested on OLPC XO-1.75 machine. Doesn't affect the OLPC XO-1's Cafe
> driver, since that one doesn't do DMA.
>
> Fixes: d790b7eda953df474f470169ebdf111c02fa7a2d

Could you use the proper 'fixes' format here?
Fixes: d790b7eda953 ("[media] vb2-dma-sg: move dma_(un)map_sg here")

> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/marvell-ccic/mcam-core.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/marvell-ccic/mcam-core.c 
> b/drivers/media/platform/marvell-ccic/mcam-core.c
> index f1b301810260a..d97f39bde9bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/marvell-ccic/mcam-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/marvell-ccic/mcam-core.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ struct mcam_vb_buffer {
>       struct list_head queue;
>       struct mcam_dma_desc *dma_desc; /* Descriptor virtual address */
>       dma_addr_t dma_desc_pa;         /* Descriptor physical address */
> -     int dma_desc_nent;              /* Number of mapped descriptors */
>  };
>
>  static inline struct mcam_vb_buffer *vb_to_mvb(struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *vb)
> @@ -608,9 +607,11 @@ static void mcam_dma_contig_done(struct mcam_camera 
> *cam, int frame)
>  static void mcam_sg_next_buffer(struct mcam_camera *cam)
>  {
>       struct mcam_vb_buffer *buf;
> +     struct sg_table *sg_table;
>
>       buf = list_first_entry(&cam->buffers, struct mcam_vb_buffer, queue);
>       list_del_init(&buf->queue);
> +     sg_table = vb2_dma_sg_plane_desc(&buf->vb_buf.vb2_buf, 0);
>       /*
>        * Very Bad Not Good Things happen if you don't clear
>        * C1_DESC_ENA before making any descriptor changes.
> @@ -618,7 +619,7 @@ static void mcam_sg_next_buffer(struct mcam_camera *cam)
>       mcam_reg_clear_bit(cam, REG_CTRL1, C1_DESC_ENA);
>       mcam_reg_write(cam, REG_DMA_DESC_Y, buf->dma_desc_pa);
>       mcam_reg_write(cam, REG_DESC_LEN_Y,
> -                     buf->dma_desc_nent*sizeof(struct mcam_dma_desc));
> +                     sg_table->nents*sizeof(struct mcam_dma_desc));

Space betwen operators (it was there already, I know).

Apart for that, patch seems fine to me:
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <[email protected]>

Thanks
   j
>       mcam_reg_write(cam, REG_DESC_LEN_U, 0);
>       mcam_reg_write(cam, REG_DESC_LEN_V, 0);
>       mcam_reg_set_bit(cam, REG_CTRL1, C1_DESC_ENA);
> --
> 2.21.0
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to