14.06.2019 18:09, Piotr Sroka пишет:
Commit description is mandatory.
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Sroka <pio...@cadence.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +
> +/* Cadnence NAND flash controller capabilities get from driver data. */
> +struct cadence_nand_dt_devdata {
> + /* Skew value of the output signals of the NAND Flash interface. */
> + u32 if_skew;
> + /* It informs if aging feature in the DLL PHY supported. */
> + u8 phy_dll_aging;
> + /*
> + * It informs if per bit deskew for read and write path in
> + * the PHY is supported.
> + */
> + u8 phy_per_bit_deskew;
> + /* It informs if slave DMA interface is connected to DMA engine. */
> + u8 has_dma;
There is no needed to dedicate 8 bits to a variable if you only care about a
single
bit. You may write this as:
bool has_dma : 1;
[snip]
> +static struct
> +cdns_nand_chip *to_cdns_nand_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
> +{
> + return container_of(chip, struct cdns_nand_chip, chip);
> +}
> +
> +static struct
> +cdns_nand_ctrl *to_cdns_nand_ctrl(struct nand_controller *controller)
> +{
> + return container_of(controller, struct cdns_nand_ctrl, controller);
> +}
It's better to inline explicitly such cases because they won't get inlined with
some
kernel configurations, like enabled ftracing for example.
> +static bool
> +cadence_nand_dma_buf_ok(struct cdns_nand_ctrl *cdns_ctrl, const void *buf,
> + u32 buf_len)
> +{
> + u8 data_dma_width = cdns_ctrl->caps2.data_dma_width;
> +
> + return buf && virt_addr_valid(buf) &&
> + likely(IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)buf, data_dma_width)) &&
> + likely(IS_ALIGNED(buf_len, data_dma_width));
> +}
> +
> +static int cadence_nand_wait_for_value(struct cdns_nand_ctrl *cdns_ctrl,
> + u32 reg_offset, u32 timeout_us,
> + u32 mask, bool is_clear)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(cdns_ctrl->reg + reg_offset,
> + val, !(val & mask) == is_clear,
> + 10, timeout_us);
Apparently you don't care about having memory barrier here, hence
readl_relaxed_poll_timeout().
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(cdns_ctrl->dev,
> + "Timeout while waiting for reg %x with mask %x is clear
> %d\n",
> + reg_offset, mask, is_clear);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int cadence_nand_set_ecc_enable(struct cdns_nand_ctrl *cdns_ctrl,
> + bool enable)
> +{
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + if (cadence_nand_wait_for_value(cdns_ctrl, CTRL_STATUS,
> + 1000000,
> + CTRL_STATUS_CTRL_BUSY, true))
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> + reg = readl(cdns_ctrl->reg + ECC_CONFIG_0);
> +
> + if (enable)
> + reg |= ECC_CONFIG_0_ECC_EN;
> + else
> + reg &= ~ECC_CONFIG_0_ECC_EN;
> +
> + writel(reg, cdns_ctrl->reg + ECC_CONFIG_0);
And here.. looks like there is no need for the memory barries, hence use the
relaxed
versions of readl/writel. Same for the rest of the patch.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void cadence_nand_set_ecc_strength(struct cdns_nand_ctrl *cdns_ctrl,
> + u8 corr_str_idx)
> +{
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + if (cdns_ctrl->curr_corr_str_idx == corr_str_idx)
> + return;
> +
> + reg = readl(cdns_ctrl->reg + ECC_CONFIG_0);
> + reg &= ~ECC_CONFIG_0_CORR_STR;
> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(ECC_CONFIG_0_CORR_STR, corr_str_idx);
> + writel(reg, cdns_ctrl->reg + ECC_CONFIG_0);
> +
> + cdns_ctrl->curr_corr_str_idx = corr_str_idx;
> +}
> +
> +static u8 cadence_nand_get_ecc_strength_idx(struct cdns_nand_ctrl *cdns_ctrl,
> + u8 strength)
> +{
> + u8 i, corr_str_idx = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < BCH_MAX_NUM_CORR_CAPS; i++) {
> + if (cdns_ctrl->ecc_strengths[i] == strength) {
> + corr_str_idx = i;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
Is it a error case when i == BCH_MAX_NUM_CORR_CAPS?
> + return corr_str_idx;
> +}
> +
> +static int cadence_nand_set_skip_marker_val(struct cdns_nand_ctrl *cdns_ctrl,
> + u16 marker_value)
> +{
> + u32 reg = 0;
> +
> + if (cadence_nand_wait_for_value(cdns_ctrl, CTRL_STATUS,
> + 1000000,
> + CTRL_STATUS_CTRL_BUSY, true))
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> + reg = readl(cdns_ctrl->reg + SKIP_BYTES_CONF);
> + reg &= ~SKIP_BYTES_MARKER_VALUE;
> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(SKIP_BYTES_MARKER_VALUE,
> + marker_value);
> +
> + writel(reg, cdns_ctrl->reg + SKIP_BYTES_CONF);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cadence_nand_set_skip_bytes_conf(struct cdns_nand_ctrl *cdns_ctrl,
> + u8 num_of_bytes,
> + u32 offset_value,
> + int enable)
> +{
> + u32 reg = 0;
> + u32 skip_bytes_offset = 0;
Please don't initialize variables if not necessary. You could also write this
in a
single line.
u32 skip_bytes_offset, reg;
Same for the rest of the patch.
> + if (cadence_nand_wait_for_value(cdns_ctrl, CTRL_STATUS,
> + 1000000,
> + CTRL_STATUS_CTRL_BUSY, true))
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> + if (!enable) {
> + num_of_bytes = 0;
> + offset_value = 0;
> + }
> +
> + reg = readl(cdns_ctrl->reg + SKIP_BYTES_CONF);
> + reg &= ~SKIP_BYTES_NUM_OF_BYTES;
> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(SKIP_BYTES_NUM_OF_BYTES,
> + num_of_bytes);
> + skip_bytes_offset = FIELD_PREP(SKIP_BYTES_OFFSET_VALUE,
> + offset_value);
> +
> + writel(reg, cdns_ctrl->reg + SKIP_BYTES_CONF);
> + writel(skip_bytes_offset, cdns_ctrl->reg + SKIP_BYTES_OFFSET);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Fucntions enables/disables hardware detection of erased data */
s/Fucntions/Function/, please use spellchecker. I'd also recommend to start all
single-line comments with a lower case (and without a dot in the end) because
it is a
more common style in the kernel and is a bit easier for the eyes.
[snip]
