Hi Aniket,

On 6/11/19 9:05 AM, Aniket Masule wrote:
> Current clock scaling calculations are same for vpu4 and
> previous versions. For vpu4, Clock scaling calculations
> are updated with cycles/mb. This helps in getting precise
> clock required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aniket Masule <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.c | 88 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.c 
> b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.c
> index f7f724b..7bcc1e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.c
> @@ -348,8 +348,9 @@ static u32 load_per_type(struct venus_core *core, u32 
> session_type)
>       return mbs_per_sec;
>  }
>  
> -static int load_scale_clocks(struct venus_core *core)
> +static int scale_clocks(struct venus_inst *inst)
>  {
> +     struct venus_core *core = inst->core;
>       const struct freq_tbl *table = core->res->freq_tbl;
>       unsigned int num_rows = core->res->freq_tbl_size;
>       unsigned long freq = table[0].freq;
> @@ -398,6 +399,86 @@ static int load_scale_clocks(struct venus_core *core)
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long calculate_inst_freq(struct venus_inst *inst)
> +{
> +     unsigned long vpp_cycles = 0;
> +     u32 mbs_per_sec;
> +
> +     mbs_per_sec = load_per_instance(inst);
> +     vpp_cycles = mbs_per_sec * inst->clk_data.codec_data->vpp_cycles;
> +     /* 21 / 20 is overhead factor */
> +     vpp_cycles += vpp_cycles / 20;

shouldn't you multiply by 21?

> +
> +     return vpp_cycles;

It is not clear to me is that vpp_cycles or frequency (rate)? I just
lost in dimensions used here.

If you return vpp_cycles could you rename the function name?

> +}
> +
> +static int scale_clocks_vpu4(struct venus_inst *inst)

does vpu4 equivalent to HFI_VERSION_4XX? If so could you rename function
to scale_clocks_v4.

> +{
> +     struct venus_core *core = inst->core;
> +     const struct freq_tbl *table = core->res->freq_tbl;
> +     unsigned int num_rows = core->res->freq_tbl_size;
> +
> +     struct clk *clk = core->clks[0];
> +     struct device *dev = core->dev;
> +     unsigned int i;
> +     unsigned long freq = 0, freq_core0 = 0, freq_core1 = 0;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     freq = calculate_inst_freq(inst);
> +
> +     if (freq > table[0].freq)
> +             goto err;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < num_rows; i++) {
> +             if (freq > table[i].freq)
> +                     break;
> +             freq = table[i].freq;
> +     }
> +
> +     inst->clk_data.freq = freq;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&core->lock);
> +     list_for_each_entry(inst, &core->instances, list) {
> +             if (inst->clk_data.core_id == VIDC_CORE_ID_1) {
> +                     freq_core0 += inst->clk_data.freq;
> +             } else if (inst->clk_data.core_id == VIDC_CORE_ID_2) {
> +                     freq_core1 += inst->clk_data.freq;
> +             } else if (inst->clk_data.core_id == VIDC_CORE_ID_3) {
> +                     freq_core0 += inst->clk_data.freq;
> +                     freq_core1 += inst->clk_data.freq;
> +             }
> +     }
> +     mutex_unlock(&core->lock);
> +
> +     freq = max(freq_core0, freq_core1);

hmm, this doesn't look right. core0 and core1 frequencies can be
different why you get the bigger and set it on both?

> +
> +     ret = clk_set_rate(clk, freq);
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto err;
> +
> +     ret = clk_set_rate(core->core0_clk, freq);

IMO this should set freq_core0

> +     if (ret)
> +             goto err;
> +
> +     ret = clk_set_rate(core->core1_clk, freq);

set freq_core1

> +     if (ret)
> +             goto err;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +
> +err:
> +     dev_err(dev, "failed to set clock rate %lu (%d)\n", freq, ret);
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int load_scale_clocks(struct venus_inst *inst)
> +{
> +     if (IS_V3(inst->core) || IS_V1(inst->core))
> +             return scale_clocks(inst);
> +     else
> +             return scale_clocks_vpu4(inst);

could you reorder this to:

        if (IS_V4())
                return scale_clocks_v4(inst);

        return scale_clocks(inst);

> +}
> +
>  static void fill_buffer_desc(const struct venus_buffer *buf,
>                            struct hfi_buffer_desc *bd, bool response)
>  {
> @@ -1053,7 +1134,7 @@ void venus_helper_vb2_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue 
> *q)
>  
>               venus_helper_free_dpb_bufs(inst);
>  
> -             load_scale_clocks(core);
> +             load_scale_clocks(inst);
>               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inst->registeredbufs);
>       }
>  
> @@ -1070,7 +1151,6 @@ void venus_helper_vb2_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue 
> *q)
>  
>  int venus_helper_vb2_start_streaming(struct venus_inst *inst)
>  {
> -     struct venus_core *core = inst->core;
>       int ret;
>  
>       ret = intbufs_alloc(inst);
> @@ -1081,7 +1161,7 @@ int venus_helper_vb2_start_streaming(struct venus_inst 
> *inst)
>       if (ret)
>               goto err_bufs_free;
>  
> -     load_scale_clocks(core);
> +     load_scale_clocks(inst);
>  
>       ret = hfi_session_load_res(inst);
>       if (ret)
> 

-- 
regards,
Stan

Reply via email to