On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:10 PM Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote: > > + { "__int128", BUILTIN_INT_KEYW }, > + { "__int128_t", BUILTIN_INT_KEYW }, > + { "__uint128_t", BUILTIN_INT_KEYW },
I wonder if it's safe to treat them as the same type, since
__int128_t and __uint128_t differ in signedness.
If someone exports a symbol with one and changes it to the other, they
would appear to be the same type.
Arnd
