On 20 June 2019 13:29, Lee Jones wrote: > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too > > Why isn't this reply attached (threaded) to the patch.
My apologies. It wasn't my intention to split Wolfram's original e-mail thread. I don't usually reply using the mailto: link from lore when creating e-mails. Outlook mustn't support the In-Reply-To header. I'll figure out a different way to reply in future. > Is your mailer broken? It's Windows
