The relation between ag_shift and blocks_per_ag is a bit more complex, and also depends on the fs block size. Since blocks_per_ag is not even being used, simply omit the check.
Signed-off-by: Axel Dörfler <[email protected]> --- fs/befs/super.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/befs/super.c b/fs/befs/super.c index 7c50025c99d8..29fa37557656 100644 --- a/fs/befs/super.c +++ b/fs/befs/super.c @@ -99,13 +99,6 @@ befs_check_sb(struct super_block *sb) return BEFS_ERR; } - - /* ag_shift also encodes the same information as blocks_per_ag in a - * different way, non-fatal consistency check - */ - if ((1 << befs_sb->ag_shift) != befs_sb->blocks_per_ag) - befs_error(sb, "ag_shift disagrees with blocks_per_ag."); - if (befs_sb->log_start != befs_sb->log_end || befs_sb->flags == BEFS_DIRTY) { befs_error(sb, "Filesystem not clean! There are blocks in the " -- 2.17.1
