Am 24.06.2019 23:58, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>
> There is a potential integer overflow when int 2 is left shifted
> as this is evaluated using 32 bit arithmetic but is being used in
> a context that expects an expression of type s64. Fix this by
> shifting 2ULL to avoid a 32 bit overflow.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> Fixes: 8a99e9faa131 ("media: vivid: add HDMI (dis)connect RX emulation")
> Fixes: 79a792dafac6 ("media: vivid: add HDMI (dis)connect TX emulation")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-ctrls.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-ctrls.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-ctrls.c
> index 3e916c8befb7..8f340cfd6993 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-ctrls.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-ctrls.c
> @@ -1634,8 +1634,8 @@ int vivid_create_controls(struct vivid_dev *dev, bool
> show_ccs_cap,
> 0, V4L2_DV_RGB_RANGE_AUTO);
> dev->ctrl_rx_power_present = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl_vid_cap,
> NULL, V4L2_CID_DV_RX_POWER_PRESENT, 0,
> - (2 << (dev->num_hdmi_inputs - 1)) - 1, 0,
> - (2 << (dev->num_hdmi_inputs - 1)) - 1);
> + (2ULL << (dev->num_hdmi_inputs - 1)) - 1, 0,
> + (2ULL << (dev->num_hdmi_inputs - 1)) - 1);
>
> }
> if (dev->num_hdmi_outputs) {
> @@ -1653,16 +1653,16 @@ int vivid_create_controls(struct vivid_dev *dev, bool
> show_ccs_cap,
> &vivid_ctrl_display_present, NULL);
> dev->ctrl_tx_hotplug = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl_vid_out,
> NULL, V4L2_CID_DV_TX_HOTPLUG, 0,
> - (2 << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1, 0,
> - (2 << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1);
> + (2ULL << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1, 0,
> + (2ULL << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1);
> dev->ctrl_tx_rxsense = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl_vid_out,
> NULL, V4L2_CID_DV_TX_RXSENSE, 0,
> - (2 << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1, 0,
> - (2 << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1);
> + (2ULL << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1, 0,
> + (2ULL << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1);
> dev->ctrl_tx_edid_present = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl_vid_out,
> NULL, V4L2_CID_DV_TX_EDID_PRESENT, 0,
> - (2 << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1, 0,
> - (2 << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1);
> + (2ULL << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1, 0,
> + (2ULL << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1);
> }
> if ((dev->has_vid_cap && dev->has_vid_out) ||
> (dev->has_vbi_cap && dev->has_vbi_out))
To make this more readable for humans, it could help to store
(2ULL << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1 in an intermediate.
like:
s64 hdmi=(2ULL << (dev->num_hdmi_outputs - 1)) - 1;
dev->ctrl_tx_edid_present = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl_vid_out,
NULL, V4L2_CID_DV_TX_EDID_PRESENT, 0,
hdmi, 0,hdmi);
just my 2 cents,
re,
wh
