On 9/2/07, David Newall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Denis Cheng wrote > > + order = get_bitmask_order(min(max, (unsigned long)UINT_MAX)) - 1; > > > > Why doesn't this clash with the max define, also in linux/kernel.h? They indeed don't clash, the cpp included by gcc is intelligent enough, it know the function-style definition of max in kernel.h, that's different from the auto variable max here, so they don't clash with each other,
But I think the variable name "max" here is ambiguous, I changed it to "limit", see my following patch [PATCH 2/3]. -- Denis Cheng - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
