On 9/1/07, Constantine A. Murenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jason Dixon wrote: > > > Once the grantor (Reyk) releases his code under that license, it must > > > remain. You are free to derive work and redistribute under your > > > license, but the original copyright and license permission remains > > > intact. Many other entities (Microsoft, Apple, Sun, etc) have used BSD > > > code and have no problem understanding this. Why is this so difficult > > > for the Linux brain share to absorb? > > > > Why is it so difficult to understand dual licensing? > > Maybe because Reyk's code was never dual-licensed?
We asked SFLC to work with us to make sure that everyone's copyrights were respected in the right places, and that the licenses various developers wanted for their copyrights were implemented correctly. The patch I sent implements SFLC's suggestions in that regard. Luis - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
