On 25-06-19, 13:32, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index aee024e42618..f07454249fbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1379,8 +1379,8 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
>               cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
>  
>       if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
> -             policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
> -
> +             of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
> +     

We don't need any error checking here anymore ?

>       pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
>  
>       return 0;
> @@ -1468,10 +1468,8 @@ static int cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>               goto unlock;
>       }
>  
> -     if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver)) {
> -             cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy->cdev);
> -             policy->cdev = NULL;
> -     }
> +     if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
> +             cpufreq_cooling_unregister(policy);

And we unregister unconditionally, even if we failed ? What if this
routine prints error messages for such an case ?

>  
>       if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu)
>               cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu(policy);
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> index 83486775e593..007c7c6bf845 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct cpufreq_cooling_device {
>       struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>       struct list_head node;
>       struct time_in_idle *idle_time;
> +     struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
>  };
>  
>  static DEFINE_IDA(cpufreq_ida);
> @@ -606,6 +607,7 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np,
>               goto remove_ida;
>  
>       cpufreq_cdev->clipped_freq = get_state_freq(cpufreq_cdev, 0);
> +     cpufreq_cdev->cdev = cdev;
>  
>       mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
>       /* Register the notifier for first cpufreq cooling device */
> @@ -699,18 +701,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_cpufreq_cooling_register);
>   *
>   * This interface function unregisters the "thermal-cpufreq-%x" cooling 
> device.
>   */
> -void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> +void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
>       struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev;
>       bool last;
>  
> -     if (!cdev)
> -             return;
> -
> -     cpufreq_cdev = cdev->devdata;
> -
>       mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock);
> -     list_del(&cpufreq_cdev->node);
> +     list_for_each_entry(cpufreq_cdev, &cpufreq_cdev_list, node) {
> +             if (cpufreq_cdev->policy == policy) {
> +                     list_del(&cpufreq_cdev->node);
> +                     break;
> +             }
> +     }

What if we reach here without a match for the policy ? We shouldn't
continue and error out, right ? Print an error message as well ?

-- 
viresh

Reply via email to