Hello, On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:12:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > We are working hard to get the remaining pieces in and to the best of my > knowledge there is no hard resistance against merging them.
I wonder whether it'd be useful to build some consensus around the approach. It'd be a lot easier for everyone involved than having the same conversation repeatedly. What do you think? > What we are trying at the moment is to reduce the surface of the bulk of RT > changes and get the 'innocent' ones in. If you feel more comfortable, then > we can surely redo the series and pick 1,2,6 for now and keep 3-5 for the > final submission. Yeah, that sounds good. Thanks. -- tejun
