Deadlock checks are performed at two places:

 - Within current's held lock stack, check for lock recursion deadlock.
 - Within dependency graph, check for lock inversion deadlock.

Rename the two relevant functions for later use. Plus, with
recursive-read locks, only a dependency circle in graph is not a
sufficient condition for lock inversion deadlocks anymore, so
check_noncircular() is not entirely accurate.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 341f521..e30e9e4 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1714,8 +1714,8 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct 
lock_class *class)
  * Print an error and return 0 if it does.
  */
 static noinline int
-check_noncircular(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target,
-                 struct lock_trace *trace)
+check_deadlock_graph(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target,
+                    struct lock_trace *trace)
 {
        int ret;
        struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
@@ -2302,7 +2302,8 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * Check whether we are holding such a class already.
+ * Check whether we are holding such a class already in the current
+ * held lock stack.
  *
  * (Note that this has to be done separately, because the graph cannot
  * detect such classes of deadlocks.)
@@ -2310,7 +2311,7 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void)
  * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read
  */
 static int
-check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
+check_deadlock_current(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
 {
        struct held_lock *prev;
        struct held_lock *nest = NULL;
@@ -2394,7 +2395,7 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void)
 
        /*
         * Prove that the new <prev> -> <next> dependency would not
-        * create a circular dependency in the graph. (We do this by
+        * create a deadlock scenario in the graph. (We do this by
         * a breadth-first search into the graph starting at <next>,
         * and check whether we can reach <prev>.)
         *
@@ -2402,7 +2403,7 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void)
         * MAX_CIRCULAR_QUEUE_SIZE) which keeps track of a breadth of nodes
         * in the graph whose neighbours are to be checked.
         */
-       ret = check_noncircular(next, prev, trace);
+       ret = check_deadlock_graph(next, prev, trace);
        if (unlikely(ret <= 0))
                return 0;
 
@@ -2878,7 +2879,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
                 * The simple case: does the current hold the same lock
                 * already?
                 */
-               int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock);
+               int ret = check_deadlock_current(curr, hlock);
 
                if (!ret)
                        return 0;
-- 
1.8.3.1

Reply via email to