On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:09:53 +0200 Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 04:55:06PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:17:40 +0200 > > Cornelia Huck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 18:19:36 +0200 (CEST) > > > Sebastian Ott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > > Sometimes, we want to control which of the matching drivers > > > > > binds to a subchannel device (e.g. for subchannels we want to > > > > > handle via vfio-ccw). > > > > > > > > > > For pci devices, a mechanism to do so has been introduced in > > > > > 782a985d7af2 ("PCI: Introduce new device binding path using > > > > > pci_dev.driver_override"). It makes sense to introduce the > > > > > driver_override attribute for subchannel devices as well, so > > > > > that we can easily extend the 'driverctl' tool (which makes > > > > > use of the driver_override attribute for pci). > > > > > > > > > > Note that unlike pci we still require a driver override to > > > > > match the subchannel type; matching more than one subchannel > > > > > type is probably not useful anyway. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Should I take that via our git tree or do you have other patches > > > > depending > > > > on this one? > > > > > > > > > > No, this patch is stand-alone; everything else is happening in user > > > space, so taking it via your tree would be great. Thanks! > > > > Friendly ping (I don't see it on s390/features yet; or is this going > > via some other path?) > > > > It is there now. Just waited until latest ci results to push the branch. > Sorry for delay. > Awesome, thanks!
