On 24.06.19 11:18:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > While auditing all module notifiers I noticed a whole bunch of fail > wrt the return value. Notifiers have a 'special' return semantics. > > Cc: Robert Richter <[email protected]> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> > Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> > Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]> > Cc: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> > Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <[email protected]> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c | 4 ++-- > kernel/module.c | 9 +++++---- > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 8 ++++++-- > kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 +- > kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 2 +- > kernel/trace/trace_printk.c | 4 ++-- > kernel/tracepoint.c | 2 +- > 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Robert Richter <[email protected]>
