On Monday, July 1, 2019 6:20:17 PM CEST Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 12:42:14PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > This series of patches addresses a few issues related to the handling of > > hibernation in the PCI bus type and the ACPI PM domain and ACPI LPSS driver. > > > > The v2 addresses Hans' concerns regarding the LPSS changes. > > > > First of all, all of the runtime-suspended PCI devices and devices in the > > ACPI PM and LPSS > > PM domains will be resumed during hibernation (first patch). This appears > > to be the > > only way to avoid weird corner cases and the benefit from avoiding to > > resume those > > devices during hibernation is questionable. > > > > That change allows the the hibernation callbacks in all of the involved > > subsystems to be > > simplified (patches 2 and 3). > > > > Moreover, reusing bus-level suspend callbacks for the "poweroff" transition > > during > > hibernation (which is the case for the ACPI PM domain and LPSS) is > > incorrect, so patch 4 > > fixes that. > > > > Finally, there are some leftover items in linux/acpi.h that can be dropped > > (patch 5). > > For the whole series, > > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> >
Thanks! Queued for 5.3 with the tags from you and Hans (I've fixed up comments in the first patch while applying it).
