On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 04:29:07PM +0800, Tao Xu wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -5213,6 +5213,9 @@ bool nested_vmx_exit_reflected(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
> u32 exit_reason)
>       case EXIT_REASON_ENCLS:
>               /* SGX is never exposed to L1 */
>               return false;
> +     case EXIT_REASON_UMWAIT: case EXIT_REASON_TPAUSE:

Grouped case statements are usually stacked vertically, e.g.:

        case EXIT_REASON_UMWAIT:
        case EXIT_REASON_TPAUSE:

> +             return nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12,
> +                     SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE);
>       default:
>               return true;
>       }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 0787f140d155..e026b1313dc3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -5349,6 +5349,20 @@ static int handle_monitor(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>       return handle_nop(vcpu);
>  }
>  
> +static int handle_umwait(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +     kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> +     WARN(1, "this should never happen\n");

Blech.  I'm guessing this code was copy-pasted from handle_xsaves() and
handle_xrstors().  The blurb of "this should never happen" isn't very
helpful, e.g. the WARN itself makes it pretty obvious that we don't expect
to reach this point.  WARN_ONCE would also be preferable, no need to spam
the log in the event things go completely haywire.

Rather than propagate ugly code, what about defining a common helper, e.g.

static int handle_unexpected_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
        kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
        WARN_ONCE(1, "Unexpected VM-Exit = 0x%x", vmcs_read32(VM_EXIT_REASON));
        return 1;
}

...
{
        [EXIT_REASON_XSAVES]                  = handle_unexpected_vmexit,
        [EXIT_REASON_XRSTORS]                 = handle_unexpected_vmexit,

        [EXIT_REASON_UMWAIT]                  = handle_unexpected_vmexit,
        [EXIT_REASON_TPAUSE]                  = handle_unexpected_vmexit,

}

> +     return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int handle_tpause(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +     kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> +     WARN(1, "this should never happen\n");
> +     return 1;
> +}
> +
>  static int handle_invpcid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>       u32 vmx_instruction_info;
> @@ -5559,6 +5573,8 @@ static int (*kvm_vmx_exit_handlers[])(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu) = {
>       [EXIT_REASON_VMFUNC]                  = handle_vmx_instruction,
>       [EXIT_REASON_PREEMPTION_TIMER]        = handle_preemption_timer,
>       [EXIT_REASON_ENCLS]                   = handle_encls,
> +     [EXIT_REASON_UMWAIT]                  = handle_umwait,
> +     [EXIT_REASON_TPAUSE]                  = handle_tpause,
>  };
>  
>  static const int kvm_vmx_max_exit_handlers =
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Reply via email to