On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:51:31AM +0200, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
>Do not mark regions that are marked with nomap to be present, otherwise
>these memblock cause unnecessarily allocation of metadata.
>
>Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
>Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatas...@oracle.com>
>Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalva...@suse.de>
>Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
>Cc: Mike Rapoport <r...@linux.ibm.com>
>Cc: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>
>Cc: Qian Cai <c...@lca.pw>
>Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@gmail.com>
>Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <log...@deltatee.com>
>Cc: linux...@kvack.org
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Signed-off-by: KarimAllah Ahmed <karah...@amazon.de>
>---
> mm/sparse.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>index fd13166..33810b6 100644
>--- a/mm/sparse.c
>+++ b/mm/sparse.c
>@@ -256,6 +256,10 @@ void __init memblocks_present(void)
>       struct memblock_region *reg;
> 
>       for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
>+
>+              if (memblock_is_nomap(reg))
>+                      continue;
>+
>               memory_present(memblock_get_region_node(reg),
>                              memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg),
>                              memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg));


The logic looks good, while I am not sure this would take effect. Since the
metadata is SECTION size aligned while memblock is not.

If I am correct, on arm64, we mark nomap memblock in map_mem()

    memblock_mark_nomap(kernel_start, kernel_end - kernel_start);

And kernel text area is less than 40M, if I am right. This means
memblocks_present would still mark the section present. 

Would you mind showing how much memory range it is marked nomap?

>-- 
>2.7.4

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

Reply via email to