Hi Denis, On 2019/07/14, Denis Efremov wrote: > This patch adds a check to warn about static EXPORT_SYMBOL* functions > during the modpost. In most of the cases, a static symbol marked for > exporting is an odd combination that should be fixed either by deleting > the exporting mark or by removing the static attribute and adding the > appropriate declaration to headers. > > If this check will be considered useful, I will resend the patch with > review fixes. > > Currently, this check emits the warnings on the following symbols, most > of which are accepted to be fixed: > 1. "sas_wait_eh" [drivers/scsi/libsas/libsas] > Patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/8/970 (accepted) > 2. "torture_onoff_cleanup" [kernel/torture] > "torture_shuffle_cleanup" [kernel/torture] > Patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/4/411 (accepted) > 3. "LZ4HC_setExternalDict" [lib/lz4/lz4hc_compress] > Patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/8/842 > 4. "drm_client_close" [drivers/gpu/drm/drm] > Patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/3/758 (accepted) > 5. "gve_probe" [drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve] > Patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/14/65 > 6. "i2c_new_client_device" [vmlinux] > "i2c_new_dummy_device" [vmlinux] > Patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/7/226 (fixed in a different patch) > 7. "ahci_em_messages" [drivers/ata/libahci] > Patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/10/550 (reviwed) > 8. "ftrace_set_clr_event" [vmlinux] > Patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/4/609 (reviwed) > 9. "rmi_2d_sensor_set_input_params" [drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_core] > Patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/8/999 > 10. "empty_zero_page" [vmlinux] > 11. "phys_base" [vmlinux] > 12. "hypercall_page" [vmlinux] > > Similar commits: > 1. 54638c6eaf44 ("net: phy: make exported variables non-static") > 2. 98ef2046f28b ("mm: remove the exporting of totalram_pages") > 3. 73df167c819e ("s390/zcrypt: remove the exporting of > ap_query_configuration") > 4. a57caf8c527f ("sunrpc/cache: remove the exporting of cache_seq_next") > 5. e4e4730698c9 ("crypto: skcipher - remove the exporting of > skcipher_walk_next") > > Build time impact, allmodconfig, Dell XPS 15 9570 (measurements 3x): > $ make mrproper; make allmodconfig; time make -j12; \ > git checkout HEAD~1; \ > make mrproper; make allmodconfig; time make -j12 > 1. > (with patch) 17635,94s user 1895,54s system 1085% cpu 29:59,22 total > (w/o patch) 17275,42s user 1803,87s system 1112% cpu 28:35,66 total > 2. > (with patch) 17369,51s user 1763,28s system 1111% cpu 28:41,47 total > (w/o patch) 16880,50s user 1670,93s system 1113% cpu 27:46,56 total > 3. > (with patch) 17937,88s user 1842,53s system 1109% cpu 29:42,26 total > (w/o patch) 17267,55s user 1725,09s system 1111% cpu 28:28,17 total > > Thus, the current implementation adds approx. 1 min for allmodconfig. > However, it's possible to do the check in a more optimal way if it will > be considered useful. > > Also, this kind of check could be implemented as a separate script instead. > Here is the implementation: > https://gist.github.com/evdenis/bf2322d094f0c02c0f60fe0a225848b2 >
Personally I think this is a pretty good feature. If I did my numbers correctly, the above numbers show ~2% increase. Although one should be able to reduce that if people feel too strongly. That said, the patch is: Acked-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> Can we make sure that patches for all issues are out (on the respective mailing lists, or merged) before this lands. HTH Emil
