On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 21:52:40 +0000 Roman Gushchin <g...@fb.com> wrote:
> > Hmm, this isn't really a common situation that I'd thought about, but it
> > seems reasonable to make the boundaries when in low reclaim to be between
> > min and low, rather than 0 and low. I'll add another patch with that. Thanks
>
> It's not a stopper, so I'm perfectly fine with a follow-up patch.
Did this happen?
I'm still trying to get this five month old patchset unstuck :(. The
review status is:
[1/3] mm, memcg: proportional memory.{low,min} reclaim
Acked-by: Johannes
Reviewed-by: Roman
[2/3] mm, memcg: make memory.emin the baseline for utilisation determination
Acked-by: Johannes
[3/3] mm, memcg: make scan aggression always exclude protection
Reviewed-by: Roman
I do have a note here that mhocko intended to take a closer look but I
don't recall whether that happened.
I could
a) say what the hell and merge them or
b) sit on them for another cycle or
c) drop them and ask Chris for a resend so we can start again.
