On Mon 2019-07-15 16:57:32, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> From: Enrico Weigelt <i...@metux.net>
>
> The current error message on failed probing tends to be a bit
> misleading. Fix it to tell exactly that an APU v1 was not found.
>
> Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt <i...@metux.net>
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-apu.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-apu.c b/drivers/leds/leds-apu.c
> index 451cb9f..892fea7 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-apu.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-apu.c
> @@ -170,13 +170,9 @@ static int __init apu_led_init(void)
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> int err;
>
> - if (!dmi_match(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "PC Engines")) {
> - pr_err("No PC Engines board detected\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> - if (!(dmi_match(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "APU"))) {
> - pr_err("Unknown PC Engines board: %s\n",
> - dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME));
> + if (!(dmi_match(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "PC Engines") &&
> + dmi_match(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "APU"))) {
> + pr_err("No PC Engines APUv1 board detected\n");
You may want to add here: "For APUv2,3 support, enable CONFIG_xxx".
If you have any APUv2 users (and you may), this si chance to get their
attention.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
