acpi_evaluate_object() will already return in error if the method does not
exist. Checking if the method is absent before the acpi_evaluate_object()
call is not needed. Remove acpi_has_method() calls to avoid additional
work.

Signed-off-by: Kelsey Skunberg <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c 
b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c
index 9716bc3abaf9..7130e90773ed 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/acpi_thermal_rel.c
@@ -77,9 +77,6 @@ int acpi_parse_trt(acpi_handle handle, int *trt_count, struct 
trt **trtp,
        struct acpi_buffer element = { 0, NULL };
        struct acpi_buffer trt_format = { sizeof("RRNNNNNN"), "RRNNNNNN" };
 
-       if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_TRT"))
-               return -ENODEV;
-
        status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_TRT", NULL, &buffer);
        if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
                return -ENODEV;
@@ -158,9 +155,6 @@ int acpi_parse_art(acpi_handle handle, int *art_count, 
struct art **artp,
        struct acpi_buffer art_format = {
                sizeof("RRNNNNNNNNNNN"), "RRNNNNNNNNNNN" };
 
-       if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_ART"))
-               return -ENODEV;
-
        status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_ART", NULL, &buffer);
        if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
                return -ENODEV;
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to