On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 23:16:47 +0530 Hariprasad Kelam <[email protected]> wrote:
> Code is same if translate is true/false in case invalid packet is > received.So remove else part. > > Issue identified with coccicheck > > Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c | 29 ++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c > index cf37268..a51bbe7 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c > @@ -2108,29 +2108,16 @@ static void rx_data(struct net_device *dev, struct > rcs __iomem *prcs, > #endif > > if (!sniffer) { > - if (translate) { > /* TBD length needs fixing for translated header */ > - if (rx_len < (ETH_HLEN + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH) || > - rx_len > > - (dev->mtu + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH + ETH_HLEN + > - FCS_LEN)) { > - pr_debug( > - "ray_cs invalid packet length %d > received\n", > - rx_len); > - return; > - } > - } else { /* encapsulated ethernet */ > - > - if (rx_len < (ETH_HLEN + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH) || > - rx_len > > - (dev->mtu + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH + ETH_HLEN + > - FCS_LEN)) { > - pr_debug( > - "ray_cs invalid packet length %d > received\n", > - rx_len); > - return; > + if (rx_len < (ETH_HLEN + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH) || > + rx_len > > + (dev->mtu + RX_MAC_HEADER_LENGTH + ETH_HLEN + > + FCS_LEN)) { > + pr_debug( > + "ray_cs invalid packet length %d received\n", > + rx_len); > + return; > } > - } NACK. The TBD comment makes no sense anymore if you remove one of the branches. Believe me or not, I have one of those cards, a (yes, 22 years old) Buslink Raytheon model 24020. That check needed (for sure) and needs (maybe) to be fixed. Besides, patch subject and resulting coding style are also wrong. -- Stefano
