On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:49:45PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > Ok, I dug around and the gold linker is not being used here, only clang > > > > to build the source and GNU ld to link, and I am still seeing this > > > > error. > > > > > > Odd combo. > > > > I'm not disagreeing :) > > > > Wait, does clang link things itself and not need ld? > > Nah. > > > > > Hm, clang 8 does not cause this error, but clang 9 does. Let me go poke > > > > the people who are providing this version of clang to see if there's > > > > something they can figure out. > > > > > > Let me try that with my clang variant. Which version of GNU ld are you > > > using? > > > > I think it is 2.27: > > $ ./ld --version > > GNU ld (binutils-2.27-44492f8) 2.27.0.20170315 > > > > Which does feel old to me. > > > > I know 2.32 works fine. > > 2.31 works fine as well. > > > Gotta love old tool-chains :( > > Oh yes. /me does archaeology to find a VM with old stuff
I can provide a binary if you can't find anything. thanks, greg k-h
