> On Jul 25, 2019, at 1:14 AM, Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 07/24, Song Liu wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2019, at 4:37 AM, Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/24, Song Liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> lock_page(old_page);
>>>> @@ -177,15 +180,24 @@ static int __replace_page(struct vm_area_struct
>>>> *vma, unsigned long addr,
>>>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>>>> err = -EAGAIN;
>>>> if (!page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
>>>> - mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(new_page, memcg, false);
>>>> + if (!orig)
>>>> + mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(new_page, memcg, false);
>>>> goto unlock;
>>>> }
>>>> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(addr != pvmw.address, old_page);
>>>>
>>>> get_page(new_page);
>>>> - page_add_new_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, addr, false);
>>>> - mem_cgroup_commit_charge(new_page, memcg, false, false);
>>>> - lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vma);
>>>> + if (orig) {
>>>> + lock_page(new_page); /* for page_add_file_rmap() */
>>>> + page_add_file_rmap(new_page, false);
>>>
>>>
>>> Shouldn't we re-check new_page->mapping after lock_page() ? Or we can't
>>> race with truncate?
>>
>> We can't race with truncate, because the file is open as binary and
>> protected with DENYWRITE (ETXTBSY).
>
> No. Yes, deny_write_access() protects mm->exe_file, but not the dynamic
> libraries or other files which can be mmaped.
I see. Let me see how we can cover this.
>
>>> and I am worried this code can try to lock the same page twice...
>>> Say, the probed application does MADV_DONTNEED and then writes "int3"
>>> into vma->vm_file at the same address to fool verify_opcode().
>>>
>>
>> Do you mean the case where old_page == new_page?
>
> Yes,
>
>> I think this won't
>> happen, because in uprobe_write_opcode() we only do orig_page for
>> !is_register case.
>
> See above.
>
> !is_register doesn't necessarily mean the original page was previously cow'ed.
> And even if it was cow'ed, MADV_DONTNEED can restore the original mapping.
I guess I know the case now. We can probably avoid this with an simple
check for old_page == new_page?
Thanks,
Song
