On 2019/7/26 17:37, Joseph Qi wrote:
On 19/7/26 11:36, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:In ocfs2_xa_prepare_entry(), there is an if statement on line 2136 to check whether loc->xl_entry is NULL: if (loc->xl_entry) When loc->xl_entry is NULL, it is used on line 2158: ocfs2_xa_add_entry(loc, name_hash); loc->xl_entry->xe_name_hash = cpu_to_le32(name_hash); loc->xl_entry->xe_name_offset = cpu_to_le16(loc->xl_size); and line 2164: ocfs2_xa_add_namevalue(loc, xi); loc->xl_entry->xe_value_size = cpu_to_le64(xi->xi_value_len); loc->xl_entry->xe_name_len = xi->xi_name_len; Thus, possible null-pointer dereferences may occur. To fix these bugs, if loc-xl_entry is NULL, ocfs2_xa_prepare_entry() abnormally returns with -EINVAL. These bugs are found by a static analysis tool STCheck written by us. Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]> --- fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c index 385f3aaa2448..f690502daf3c 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c @@ -2154,8 +2154,10 @@ static int ocfs2_xa_prepare_entry(struct ocfs2_xa_loc *loc, } } ocfs2_xa_wipe_namevalue(loc); - } else - ocfs2_xa_add_entry(loc, name_hash); + } else { + rc = -EINVAL; + goto out; + }Since entry not found, so there is nothing to do in ocfs2_xa_prepare_entry(). We may change it like: if (!loc->xl_entry) { rc = -EINVAL; goto out; } if (ocfs2_xa_can_reuse_entry(loc, xi)) { ...... } .....
Okay, I will send a v2 patch. Best wishes, Jia-Ju Bai

