On 29-07-19, 17:49, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. > > This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm): > > drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c: In function ‘dra7_efuse_xlate’: > drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c:79:20: warning: this statement may fall through > [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP; > drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c:80:2: note: here > case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_OD_MPU_OPP: > ^~~~ > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c > index 2ad1ae17932d..aeaa883a8c9d 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static unsigned long dra7_efuse_xlate(struct > ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data, > case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP: > case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_HIGH_MPU_OPP: > calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP; > + /* Fall through */ > case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_OD_MPU_OPP: > calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_OD_MPU_OPP; > }
Applied. Thanks. -- viresh

