On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:04:26PM +0200, Hubert Feurstein wrote:
> The MV88E6220 is almost the same as MV88E6250 except that the ports 2-4 are
> not routed to pins. So the usable ports are 0, 1, 5 and 6.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hubert Feurstein <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> index 6b17cd961d06..c4982ced908e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> @@ -4283,6 +4283,31 @@ static const struct mv88e6xxx_info mv88e6xxx_table[] =
> {
> .ops = &mv88e6240_ops,
> },
Hi Hubert
We try to keep all these lists in strict numerical order. Please can
you add 6220 before 6240, in all the places you have added it.
Thanks
Andrew
