In theory, a timer is used to defer wakeups of no-CBs grace-period
kthreads when the wakeup cannot be done safely directly from the
call_rcu().  In practice, the one-jiffy delay is not always consistent
with timely callback invocation under heavy call_rcu() loads.  Therefore,
there are a number of checks for a pending deferred wakeup, including
from the scheduling-clock interrupt.  Unfortunately, this check follows
the rcu_nohz_full_cpu() early exit, which renders it useless on such CPUs.

This commit therefore moves the check for the pending deferred no-CB
wakeup to precede the rcu_nohz_full_cpu() early exit.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index ea479d81da7f..f1a25d17e3a0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2739,6 +2739,10 @@ static int rcu_pending(void)
        /* Check for CPU stalls, if enabled. */
        check_cpu_stall(rdp);
 
+       /* Does this CPU need a deferred NOCB wakeup? */
+       if (rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(rdp))
+               return 1;
+
        /* Is this CPU a NO_HZ_FULL CPU that should ignore RCU? */
        if (rcu_nohz_full_cpu())
                return 0;
@@ -2763,10 +2767,6 @@ static int rcu_pending(void)
            unlikely(READ_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap))) /* outside lock */
                return 1;
 
-       /* Does this CPU need a deferred NOCB wakeup? */
-       if (rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(rdp))
-               return 1;
-
        /* nothing to do */
        return 0;
 }
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to