On 8/1/2019 8:06 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Thu 01 Aug 03:07 PDT 2019, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

[..]
+static const struct msm_pingroup sc7180_groups[] = {
+       [0] = PINGROUP(0, SOUTH, qup01, cri_trng, _, phase_flag, _, _, _, _, _),
+       [1] = PINGROUP(1, SOUTH, qup01, cri_trng, _, phase_flag, _, _, _, _, _),
+       [2] = PINGROUP(2, SOUTH, qup01, cri_trng, _, phase_flag, _, _, _, _, _),
+       [3] = PINGROUP(3, SOUTH, qup01, sp_cmu, dbg_out, qdss_cti, _, _, _, _, 
_),
+       [4] = PINGROUP(4, NORTH, sdc1_tb, _, qdss_cti, _, _, _, _, _, _), [5] = 
PINGROUP(5, NORTH, sdc2_tb, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _),
+       [6] = PINGROUP(6, NORTH, qup11, qup11, _, _, _, _, _, _, _), [7] = 
PINGROUP(7, NORTH, qup11, qup11, ddr_bist, _, _, _, _, _, _),

5 and 7 deserve to be on their own line :)

Oops, looks like some formatting mess, I'll fix and resend.


Apart from that:

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>

thanks for the review.


Regards,
Bjorn


--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Reply via email to