Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Use rq_lock/unlock in online_fair_sched_group

[Dietmar Eggemann]

On 8/8/19 1:01 PM, tip-bot for Phil Auld wrote:

[...]

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 19c58599e967..d9407517dae9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -10281,18 +10281,18 @@ err:
>  void online_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg)
>  {
>       struct sched_entity *se;
> +     struct rq_flags rf;
>       struct rq *rq;
>       int i;
>  
>       for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>               rq = cpu_rq(i);
>               se = tg->se[i];
> -
> -             raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
> +             rq_lock(rq, &rf);
>               update_rq_clock(rq);
>               attach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
>               sync_throttle(tg, i);
> -             raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
> +             rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
>       }
>  }

Shouldn't this be:

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d9407517dae9..1054d2cf6aaa 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10288,11 +10288,11 @@ void online_fair_sched_group(struct task_group
*tg)
        for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
                rq = cpu_rq(i);
                se = tg->se[i];
-               rq_lock(rq, &rf);
+               rq_lock_irq(rq, &rf);
                update_rq_clock(rq);
                attach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
                sync_throttle(tg, i);
-               rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
+               rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
        }
 }

Currently, you should get a 'inconsistent lock state' warning with
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING.