Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 19:29, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:55:26PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
 Hi Guenter,


Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 18:52, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> a écrit :
 >On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
 >> Hi,
 >>
>> This patchset comes from a bigger patchset that was cut in smaller
 >> pieces for easier integration to mainline.
 >> (The patchset was https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/27/1837)
 >>
 >> The reviews were kept since the code mostly didn't change. The
 >>exception
>> is the use of device_node_to_regmap() in patch 2/3. This function was
 >> added in a prior patch, now merged in the MIPS tree.
 >>
>> For that reason this patchset is based on the ingenic-tcu-v5.4 branch
 >>of
 >> the MIPS tree
 >> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git).
 >>
 >
 >What is the expectation here ? Should the series be sent upstream
 >through the watchdog tree, or through some other tree ?

You can get it through the watchdog tree if you merge the ingenic-tcu-v5.4 branch from the MIPS tree. If you'd rather not do that, I can get it merged
 through the MIPS tree.

I would prefer a merge through the mips tree.

Guenter

Ok; Can I get some signatures then? ;)

Thanks,
-Paul


Reply via email to