state_test and smm_test are failing on older processors that do not have xcr0. This is because on those processor KVM does provide support for KVM_GET/SET_XSAVE (to avoid having to rely on the older KVM_GET/SET_FPU) but not for KVM_GET/SET_XCRS.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c index 6cb34a0fa200..0a5e487dbc50 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c @@ -1060,9 +1060,11 @@ struct kvm_x86_state *vcpu_save_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid) TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XSAVE, r: %i", r); - r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); - TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i", - r); + if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) { + r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); + TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i", + r); + } r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_SREGS, &state->sregs); TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_SREGS, r: %i", @@ -1103,9 +1105,11 @@ void vcpu_load_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_x86_state *s TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XSAVE, r: %i", r); - r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); - TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i", - r); + if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) { + r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); + TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i", + r); + } r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_SREGS, &state->sregs); TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_SREGS, r: %i", -- 1.8.3.1
