Hi! > >No need to move ctrl_brt_pointer... to keep order consistent with docs. > > OK I will reset the patches and get rid of that change. I think this got > moved when I applied the v1 patch. > > > >>+ fs_current_val = led->full_scale_current - LM3532_FS_CURR_MIN / > >>+ LM3532_FS_CURR_STEP; > >The computation is wrong ... needs () AFAICT. > > Hmm. Doesn't order of operations take precedence? > > I will add the () unless checkpatch cribs about them
I may be misunderstanding. What do you expect the computation to be? /
has higher priority than -, right? Can you test it provides expected
results?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
