The protect memory setting is a little different in the different SoCs.
In the register REG_MMU_CTRL_REG(0x110), the TF_PROT(translation fault
protect) shift bit is normally 4 while it shift 5 bits only in the
mt8173. This patch delete the complex MACRO and use a common if-else
instead.

Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong...@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgr...@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias....@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
index 34f0203..947a8c6b8 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
@@ -44,12 +44,9 @@
 #define REG_MMU_DCM_DIS                                0x050
 
 #define REG_MMU_CTRL_REG                       0x110
+#define F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR          (2 << 4)
 #define F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD          BIT(4)
-#define F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL_SHIFT(data) \
-       ((data)->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT2712 ? 4 : 5)
-/* It's named by F_MMU_TF_PROT_SEL in mt2712. */
-#define F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL(prot, data) \
-       (((prot) & 0x3) << F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL_SHIFT(data))
+#define F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR_MT8173   (2 << 5)
 
 #define REG_MMU_IVRP_PADDR                     0x114
 
@@ -539,9 +536,11 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data 
*data)
                return ret;
        }
 
-       regval = F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL(2, data);
        if (data->plat_data->m4u_plat == M4U_MT8173)
-               regval |= F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD;
+               regval = F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD |
+                        F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR_MT8173;
+       else
+               regval = F_MMU_TF_PROT_TO_PROGRAM_ADDR;
        writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_CTRL_REG);
 
        regval = F_L2_MULIT_HIT_EN |
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to