On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 11:48:43AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Aug 21, 2019, at 8:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 06:23:10AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 11:32:01AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > >> > and so it is using a store-pair instruction to reduce the complexity in > >> > the immediate generation. Thus, the 64-bit store will only have 32-bit > >> > atomicity. In fact, this is scary because if I change bar to: > >> > > >> > void bar(u64 *x) > >> > { > >> > *(volatile u64 *)x = 0xabcdef10abcdef10; > >> > } > >> > > >> > then I get: > >> > > >> > bar: > >> > mov w1, 61200 > >> > movk w1, 0xabcd, lsl 16 > >> > str w1, [x0] > >> > str w1, [x0, 4] > >> > ret > >> > > >> > so I'm not sure that WRITE_ONCE would even help :/ > >> > >> Well, I can have the LWN article cite your email, then. So thank you > >> very much! > >> > >> Is generation of this code for a 64-bit volatile store considered a bug? > >> Or does ARMv8 exclude the possibility of 64-bit MMIO registers? And I > >> would guess that Thomas and Linus would ask a similar bugginess question > >> for normal stores. ;-) > > > > I'm calling this a compiler bug; the way I understand volatile this is > > very much against the intentended use case. That is, this is buggy even > > on UP vs signals or MMIO. > > And here is a simpler reproducer on my gcc-8.3.0 (aarch64) compiled with O2: > > volatile unsigned long a; > > void fct(void) > { > a = 0x1234567812345678ULL; > } > > void fct(void) > { > a = 0x1234567812345678ULL; > 0: 90000000 adrp x0, 8 <fct+0x8> > 4: 528acf01 mov w1, #0x5678 // #22136 > 8: 72a24681 movk w1, #0x1234, lsl #16 > c: f9400000 ldr x0, [x0] > 10: b9000001 str w1, [x0] > 14: b9000401 str w1, [x0, #4] > } > 18: d65f03c0 ret
Fwiw, and, interestingly, on clang v7.0.1-8 (aarch64), I get a proper 64-bit str with the above example (even when not using volatile): 0000000000000000 <nonvol>: 0: d28acf08 mov x8, #0x5678 // #22136 4: f2a24688 movk x8, #0x1234, lsl #16 8: f2cacf08 movk x8, #0x5678, lsl #32 c: f2e24688 movk x8, #0x1234, lsl #48 10: 90000009 adrp x9, 8 <nonvol+0x8> 14: 91000129 add x9, x9, #0x0 18: f9000128 str x8, [x9] 1c: d65f03c0 ret test1.o: file format elf64-littleaarch64 And even with -O2 it is a single store: Disassembly of section .text: 0000000000000000 <nonvol>: 0: d28acf09 mov x9, #0x5678 // #22136 4: f2a24689 movk x9, #0x1234, lsl #16 8: f2cacf09 movk x9, #0x5678, lsl #32 c: 90000008 adrp x8, 8 <nonvol+0x8> 10: f2e24689 movk x9, #0x1234, lsl #48 14: f9000109 str x9, [x8] 18: d65f03c0 ret thanks, - Joel [...]