Hi Andrew,

IA64 failed to build in kgdb with the messages

arch/ia64/kernel/kgdb.c: In function 'kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint':
arch/ia64/kernel/kgdb.c:555: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to 
unsigned type
arch/ia64/kernel/kgdb.c: At top level:
arch/ia64/kernel/kgdb.c:673: error: static declaration of 'kgdb_hwbreak_sstep' 
follows non-static declaration
include/asm/kgdb.h:33: error: previous declaration of 'kgdb_hwbreak_sstep' was 
here
make[1]: *** [arch/ia64/kernel/kgdb.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/ia64/kernel] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

It's buried in git-kgdb.patch and I've cc'd who might be the owner. A candidate
fix is below. The build error seems to be a simple case of a badly placed
static. The warning about large integer truncating does not have an obvious
fix and I didn't want to hide the warning with a real bug.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
 kgdb.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.6/bin//dontdiff 
linux-2.6.23-rc6-mm1-010_fix_ehea_main/arch/ia64/kernel/kgdb.c 
linux-2.6.23-rc6-mm1-015_fix_ia64_kgdb/arch/ia64/kernel/kgdb.c
--- linux-2.6.23-rc6-mm1-010_fix_ehea_main/arch/ia64/kernel/kgdb.c      
2007-09-18 11:29:26.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc6-mm1-015_fix_ia64_kgdb/arch/ia64/kernel/kgdb.c      
2007-09-18 17:33:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ void kgdb_roundup_cpus(unsigned long fla
                smp_send_nmi_allbutself();
 }
 
-static volatile int kgdb_hwbreak_sstep[NR_CPUS];
+volatile int kgdb_hwbreak_sstep[NR_CPUS];
 
 static int kgdb_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd,
        void *ptr)
-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to