On 24.08.2019 23:26, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> SSC driver allows only synchronous TX and RX. In slave mode for BCLK
> it uses only one of TK or RK pin, but for LRCLK it configured separate
> inputs from TF and RF pins. Allow configuration with common FS signal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl>
>
> ---
> v2: use alternate DT binding
> split DT and drivers/misc changes
>
> ---
> sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c
> index 48e9eef34c0f..035d4da58f2b 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/atmel/atmel_ssc_dai.c
> @@ -605,14 +605,32 @@ static int atmel_ssc_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream
> *substream,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (!atmel_ssc_cfs(ssc_p)) {
> + if (atmel_ssc_cfs(ssc_p)) {
> + /*
> + * SSC provides LRCLK
> + *
> + * Both TF and RF are generated, so use them directly.
> + */
> + rcmr |= SSC_BF(RCMR_START, fs_edge);
> + tcmr |= SSC_BF(TCMR_START, fs_edge);
Hmm, how would this work if capture and playback start/run at the same time?
> + } else {
> fslen = fslen_ext = 0;
> rcmr_period = tcmr_period = 0;
> fs_osync = SSC_FSOS_NONE;
> - }
>
> - rcmr |= SSC_BF(RCMR_START, fs_edge);
> - tcmr |= SSC_BF(TCMR_START, fs_edge);
> + if (ssc->lrclk_from_tf_pin) {
> + rcmr |= SSC_BF(RCMR_START, SSC_START_TX_RX);
> + tcmr |= SSC_BF(TCMR_START, fs_edge);
> + } else if (ssc->lrclk_from_rf_pin) {
> + /* assume RF is to be used when RK is used as BCLK
> input */
This comment is not longer true...
> + /* Note: won't work correctly on SAMA5D2 due to errata
> */
> + rcmr |= SSC_BF(RCMR_START, fs_edge);
> + tcmr |= SSC_BF(TCMR_START, SSC_START_TX_RX);
> + } else {
> + rcmr |= SSC_BF(RCMR_START, fs_edge);
> + tcmr |= SSC_BF(TCMR_START, fs_edge);
> + }
> + }
>
> if (atmel_ssc_cbs(ssc_p)) {
> /*
>
Thanks and best regards,
Codrin
