On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:52 PM Enric Balletbo i Serra > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 23/8/19 14:53, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote: > > > Recently we refactored the CrOS EC drivers moving part of the code from > > > the MFD subsystem to the platform chrome subsystem. During this change > > > we needed to rename some config options, so, update the defconfigs > > > accordingly. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> > > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> > > > Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <[email protected]> > > > Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <[email protected]> > > > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > > > > For some reason I reduced too much the recipients from the get_maintainers > > script and I missed the defconfig maintainers. Sorry about that, so cc'ing > > Arnd, > > Olof, Will and Catalin > > > > To give you some context the full series can be found here [1]. > > > > All the patches in the series are acked and will go through the MFD tree > > (Lee > > Jones). This specific patch is still missing some acks from arm/arm64 > > defconfigs > > and if you are agree can go through the Lee's tree with your acks, > > otherwise can > > go through another tree. > > Defconfig changes often cause merge conflicts, so I'd prefer to have > this merged through the arm-soc tree. Can you resend the latest patch > with the Acks to '[email protected]' to get it into our patchwork?
How do you plan to keep this change-set bisectable? Ideally the defconfg changes should really be paired with the re-work. I was planning on creating an immutable branch for each of the stakeholders to pull from. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
